|
FOUR
THINGS
OUR SCHOOLS MUST DO NOW
Dennis Earl Fehr
The
core school subjects of the 1950s—math, reading, science and social
studies—sufficed for that decade, but they are inadequate today. With
challenges coming at us from every corner of the globe―India, the
European Union, China, the Middle East, the Pacific Rim―our children
must know more than how to work on the farm or in the factory.
How are we coping? With
a core curriculum that has been out of date for fifty years. What should
we do?
1) By 2020
monolingual workers, U.S. or otherwise, will be disadvantaged. The Romance
languages, which have dominated foreign language study in our high
schools, are (with the notable exception of Spanish) going to be less
helpful in tomorrow’s de-centered global marketplace than Mandarin,
Arabic, or Japanese. U.S. children need to start reading Spanish at the
same time they start reading English, and a third language elective should
be encouraged beginning in middle school.
2) We must start heeding the private sector’s
complaints that our schools do not graduate innovative problem-solvers. In
math every student must answer “twenty-five” when asked “What’s
five times five?” Every student in English class needs to come up with
the same word when asked to identify a sentence’s subject. On the other
hand, if we ask twenty art students to make the best possible composition
using only a square and a circle, they will produce twenty different
answers from which to choose the best.
Do we believe the
outside-the-box thinking children develop in arts classes will contribute
nothing to tomorrow’s challenges? Do the imaginings of our
artist-visionaries offer little to human progress? The nations whose
workforces have the greatest imagination, creativity, innovation, and
vision will place themselves advantageously in tomorrow's global market.
How do we accomplish that? By fostering the arts. U.S. children should
have arts classtheater,
music, or artevery day, with no arts time used for
standardized test drills.
3) The third
addition to the core must be physical education. Our fondness for eating
and TV-watching ourselves to death hardly places us at an international
advantage; yet we do not require every child to have physical education
every day—and this does not mean more recess. Nor does it mean “roll
out the basketballs” PE. It means physical education that not only
offers organized exercise (including dance), but also teaches human
physiology, drug education, safe and responsible sexual behavior, sound
diet, stress management, and team play. The literature linking physical
fitness and intellectual performance is clear; the problem is that so few
of the education field’s powerbrokers have read it.
Of course we should
retain the original core subjects, and to meet tomorrow’s needs we also
must develop fair and accurate means to measure what children know. We
need seven core subjects, each assessed with tools developed not by
profit-driven think tanks or politicians, but by people who teach those
subjects.
4)
We must address one
other factor: Ethics. A seven-core curriculum means nothing if children do
not use their knowledge ethically. If our national civility is in decline,
if our elected officials disgrace our country with their moral lapses, why
do we not teach ethical principles in our schools? Because it’s the
parent’s job? Of course it is. But some parents fail this
responsibility. Should no one then teach children the moral wisdom that
has been handed to us through the ages? Fairly or not, society’s second
line of defense is its teachers. How does one conduct scientific research
ethically? And when has science been used to do harm? How has language
been used as a wedge for dividing people? How can language help bring us
closer? As we depend more on images and less on words to convey
information, how can art class help children filter the good from the bad
on TV, the Internet and in their favorite magazines? How can PE class
teach children to work in teamsa critical component of success in a global
economy? What can community outreach projects teach kids about social
studies? Teaching ethics does not require the teaching of religion in
schools, since all great religions agree that we should be charitable,
humble, honest, and forgiving.
We
can postpone teaching these things until we have fallen behind, at which
point we will be forced to teach them, with no guarantee of success. Or we
can start teaching them now and maintain a secure place from which to
participate in the family of nations.
|